made the convert from Core to Knots.
Running it on a laptop on Fedora 42.
Now trying to run the commands from Make Knots reachable over Tor … But already stranded on command #1.
Eventually i came past it but not sure if im oke know. Also run the #3 command but didnt find the user. Changed that to my user and it went through.
Also check the group but there is no group that like debian-tor. I think it didnt go well with installing Tor.
I’m spinning up a VM with Fedora 42 now. I’ll run through the commands (should be similar to the ones I posted for RHEL / CentOS / Rocky / Alma) and see what needs to change. If you have more details about what went wrong, that will also help. I’ll post an update shortly, once I get it working.
Looks like you were following the “Debian / Ubuntu / Linux Mint / Pop!_OS / RaspOS” instructions. The ones closer to your system are under “RHEL / CentOS / Rocky / Alma”, but what I just posted above is exactly the set of commands that I ran which worked for me on Fedora 42. So it should work best for you if you follow them.
Cool. I think you should skip step #2 if you already ran that in your earlier attempt. That one appends things to the config, so if you run it more than once it will add duplicate entries.
If you’ve already run step #2 more than once, you’ll want to edit /etc/tor/torrc and remove any duplicate entries from it. You should have only one set of these rows in there:
#4. Enable RPC Server in Bitcoin Knots
Open Settings → Options
Check “Enable RPC server” , click OK .
I don’t know which one takes precidence, so you can just leave it there in your bitcoin.conf file to be sure.
This either means you have your datadir in a non-standard location (most likely) or that you have RPC authentication parameters in your bitcoin.conf (I assume not, since you only mentioned server=1 being in there). It could also mean that Knots is not running (make sure it is).
Locate where you have your datadir, and then you can update the command to:
Yes, as long as you don’t have your datadir under that folder (unlikely, but depends on how you configured it).
As long as you confirmed your node is reachable (for example, via bitnodes.io) then you are good to go. Other nodes will randomly start to connect with your node as your onion address propagates the known peers lists of other nodes that you connect with.
An step that I forgot to do is check my node on bitnodes.io
I entered my onion address here, and it shows up with a green checkmark, however, when I click on it says
PENDING
NODE STATUS PENDING ACTIVATION
Not sure about that. Also. I have noticed by copypasting some nodes from my Peers list that their addresses when you look them up on the bitnodes website, they also have this PENDING message but they have a section below that that says:
Some have other settings (looks like it’s settings of how each node is setup). But my node has nothing there. So im still wondering if this is setup properly.
Also, I thought I wasn’t helping the network because I have no incoming connections (other than the 2 127.0.0.1 ones which im still not sure what they mean)
I thought that for the node to be reachable and help the network, you would have 10in connections from other peers that are connecting to you, then the other 10out connections from where you are downloading blocks. So I don’t understand what incoming connections mean then in this context. Like I said I thought that would be people connecting to your network, and there’s none. Same for this other poster above, which also reports a 127.0.0.1 connection. So basically, how are we helping the network, if we have no incoming connections?
The bitnodes API documentation provides some useful information about what happens behind the scenes. It looks like the Pending status means “The node has just been activated pending availability of a new snapshot.” so this is probably just because your node is new.
The “7-day / 30-day / 90-day Addr monitor” and the Services section are proably also blank because your node is new. These populate when your address is propagated around the newtork and observed by Bitnodes’ crawler. Once it encounters your node within a future window, it will report what services your node is advertising.
The one connection from 127.0.0.1 I am not sure about. My theory is that Tor forwards traffic to a local port, and so perhaps the incoming peers on tor show up as coming from 127.0.0.1? This would be odd I think, but it would explain what you are seeing.
As far as helping the network, you just need connections for that (doesn’t matter if they are incoming or outgoing) The main reason to make your node a “listening” node is so that you are included on the dashboard node version summaries (such as Clark Moody) – it makes sure your node is being counted in the spam war.
Well, I don’t know what the hell has happened but the node is no longer reachable.
Im using the same bitcoin.conf values as yesterday when it was reachable so I don’t get it.