For the main features, it uses Boltz. But I integrated some other providers in the Anonymize feature (and a signing process for preventing injection risks), and some configurability. I do plan to expand on this to the other features. Other providers have fairly low liquidity is the drawback.
I had an idea which might be worth thinking about more, to integrate Pickhash if it becomes popular (after I get it more stable WRT the difficulty problem), where a user could specify a percentage of their hash toward funding a Boltz-like swap provider (with the possibility of collecting fees) to hopefully bootstrap a good alternative with more liquidity than current alternatives.
This is definitely worrying me. The era of AI attacking Bitcoin’s infrastructure seems like it is the next big challenge that we are entering, before we even have a chance to take a breath from fighting the spam war.
I’ll update Agent Wallet when I get a chance, to enable using fallback providers if available, or failing gracefully.
Oh I dunno. Probably agents looking for Lightning nodes over the Tor network and engineering Force-Close thefts??? I have a watchtower but not knowledgeable enough to breakdown what I’m suppose to monitor.
Endless attack vectors on the horizon is inside game theory. So challenging to defend against attacks..unless I have my own agent monitoring my security but how practical is that.
EDIT: Also anticipating how Fork Tower is going to work btw.
This is the direction I think I’ll take my channel after BIP-110 activates. Working through how to defend against this stuff is a big gap in the current content. I already wanted to shift focus to AI from a Bitcoin perspective, and this slots well into that direction.